Showing posts with label Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice. Show all posts
Monday, July 31, 2017
The DC Hero We Finally Deserve..."Wonder Woman"
Wonder Woman (2017)
Rated PG-13
Starring Gal Gadot, Connie Nielsen, Robin Wright, Chris Pine, Danny Huston, David Thewlis, Said Taghmaoui, Ewen Bremner, Eugene Brave Rock, Lucy Davis, Elena Anaya,
Directed by Patty Jenkins
The Story:
Bookended by seeing Diana/Wonder Woman (Gadot) in action during modern day, a briefcase delivered by Bruce Wayne allows Diana time to reflect on discovering mankind and embracing the heroic ideal she was born to live.
So, I finally got around to watching Wonder Woman.
I tried not to let the hype surrounding this movie cloud my judgement of it.
While I might be firmly in the camp of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, I totally root for DC to get it right and give the audience something worth going to see.
So naturally, I approached this one with cautious optimism.
Is the hype real?
Or is it just clamoring for something, anything from DC to erase the unwatchable bore of Batman vs. Superman or the entertaining in parts but ultimately unsatisfying Suicide Squad?
I suppose it will ultimately depend on who you ask.
I was never blown away by the trailers for Wonder Woman.
It seemed fine enough, but it was missing something for me, and I couldn't put my finger on it.
So the movie has come out, it's made more money this summer than anything else, and I couldn't be happier for the cast, crew, fans and Warner Brothers for finally, finally making a DC movie worth watching.
Depending on your point of view, it's been a long time coming, whether it was Superman: The Movie, Batman (1989) or the Nolan Batman Trilogy.
I finally got around to seeing it...
And much like the trailer, I liked it, but didn't LOVE it.
Again, there's something missing for me, and I can't quite put my finger on it.
I suppose if I have to try and isolate it, perhaps it's the sense of fun, entertainment or enjoyment that I have while watching a Marvel film.
While Wonder Woman is a technically a well made picture, the sense of fun just wasn't quite there. It bubbled under the surface through a lot of the movie.
Now to be fair, there were many, many, many enjoyable scenes and amazing set pieces that oohed and aaahed me as the movie went along.
So again, it's a tough one to judge.
Is it on par with what Marvel is giving me? No. Close, but no cigar.
If I was given 4 choices of going to see any superhero movie again in theaters, I'd be going back for Guardians or Homecoming before I went back to see Wonder Woman.
That's just me being honest.
Is it better than what DC has been giving me? Absolutely yes.
I love that Wonder Woman has been this successful for DC and for all the little girls around the world that now have a superhero role model on the big screen.
It gives me hope that Captain Marvel and maybe Black Widow will someday headline a film for Marvel or maybe DC will offer up a Catwoman movie that doesn't suck.
: )
Final Grade: B... B+ if I'm really nice. ;)
Labels:
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice,
Chris Pine,
Connie Nielsen,
Danny Huston,
David Thewlis,
DC,
Gal Gadot,
MCU,
Movie Review,
Now Playing,
Patty Jenkins,
Robin Wright,
Suicide Squad,
Wonder Woman
Thursday, November 24, 2016
It Was A Banner Year For Badness... "The 2016 Turkey Of The Year Awards"
Welcome to the FIFTH ANNIVERSARY of our annual Thanksgiving tradition celebrating the worst Hollywood had to offer.
Another year has just flown by.
Looking back at last year, only 6 movies made my worst of the year list.
This year, I've currently reviewed 185 movies, and will probably get to 200, give or take, by the end of the year.
Those movies that received grades of F through D+: 21
So about 10% of the movies I watch are lousy.
I can live with those odds, because at least the other 90% are at least passably entertaining to just plain amazing.
However, I'm not going to relive all of that pain and suffering.
There were a lot of smaller budget/never heard of it before films that can easily be overlooked, and in hindsight, should have been for my sake.
:)
I'm going to concentrate on the would-be blockbusters that should have impressed, but missed their marks, or at least on those films you probably heard about.
Either way, the list is twice as long, and twice as bad, as last year!
And that makes the fifth annual Turkey of the Year the WORST YEAR ever in movies, topping the previous record holder of 10 from 2013!!
So on that note, let's start the list by going BIG!
# 12
Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice
Sure, you say, "well, it wasn't that bad..."
I counter with you're right, and it also wasn't that good.
There was no enjoyment in watching this movie.
No thrill, no awe, no wonder.
No joy.
It was watchable, but this movie should have been the greatest movie of all time.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again:
Superman.
Batman.
Wonder Woman.
First. Time. Ever.
Together. In a film.
How do you go wrong?
Well, you had it to Warner Brothers and they go dark with director Zack Snyder.
There were some interesting ideas and moments in the film, and I totally approve of Affleck as Batman and Gadot as Wonder Woman.
Cavill, however, is not given a whole lot to do, and this Superman sequel becomes a Batman reboot.
If DC was trying to "not be Marvel" well, they fully succeeded.
And if trailers for Justice League (and even Suicide Squad) are indicators, Warner Brothers/DC have realized that these are comic book characters. It's okay to have a little fun with them.
The audience really doesn't mind, and neither do the actors.
# 11
Hail, Caesar!
An ode to the Golden Age of Hollywood, the Coen brothers recreate a big budget epic with lots of little subplots and bit characters to take a sliver of an idea and turn it into a movie. My biggest problem, was aside from Josh Brolin's character, I really didn't have any emotional investment or care in any of the other characters that he associated with throughout the movie.
However, I'm inclined to agree that I'm probably just not a big fan of the Coen Brothers library of films, as I've seen but a handful of them, not seen most of them, and really haven't been thrilled with those that I have seen.
I know, shame on me.
:)
# 10
Everest
The hardest movie that I reviewed this year, because the people were real.
And they were real idiots.
So to type things like that in a movie review, you feel bad because they were real people.
But at the end of the day, they made a lot of stupid decisions that cost themselves, and others, their lives.
And as you watch that unfold, entertainment begins to argue with logic, and you realize that you're not being entertained, and you're just kind of sick and irritated that people would make dumb decision after dumb decision, and so you want the movie to be over with, and when it is, you almost think...
You totally got what you deserved.
And this was one untold true story that should have stayed that way.
I told you, I'm heartless.
# 9
Black Mass
It wouldn't be a "Worst of the Year" list without Johnny Depp, now would it?
Breaking the tie with Leonardo DiCaprio for most appearances on these lists, Depp now has the distinction of being the worst of all time. :)
Or, at least the last 5 years.
And yes, I've debated for more than a few minutes to include the highly overrated The Revenant to this list.
So what was wrong with the film?
Hard to put my finger on it exactly, but let's start with it not being very entertaining.
I watched a documentary shortly after this, and it was better put together and more suspenseful than anything this film had to offer.
Had I watched it first, it would have possibly been a best of the year documentary contender, but by the time I saw it, this movie had pretty much soured my mood on the subject matter, so I don't think I was able to enjoy that documentary to its fullest extent.
Depp gives another performance that isn't Jack Sparrow, so there's that, but it's also one with no depth.
The real Whitey Bulger was charismatic and had people on both sides of the law in awe and fearful of him.
I never sensed that in this film.
# 8
Joy
Ah yes, this one.
Congratulations on being the only movie on this year's list that I didn't watch past the 20 minute mark.
Gold star for that, I suppose.
Just didn't care for any of the characters, though I was mildly interested to stick around for DeNiro's character.
He was the only one of the bunch I had any desire to see continue on screen, but it wasn't enough to endure this one.
# 7
The Brothers Grimsby
I've said it many times before, and I'll say it again:
I have no problem with R rated comedies if they want to be crude and vulgar, as long as they are funny while doing so.
This one was crude.
However, it was only funny about 3 different times, and that's not a good average or a film that runs under 90 minutes.
Bonus points for at least putting the audience out of their misery quickly by having a short movie.
That said, when they concentrated on parodying the spy genre, the film wasn't half bad.
But then Cohen took over again, and the movie just came screeching to a halt.
# 6
Rock the Kasbah
Another based on a true story.
Wow, that actually makes 4 of the films based on real events.
That's a really bad average considering most movies based on actual events are really good and enjoyable.
1/3 of the movies I didn't like this year actually happened.
So come on folks, have better, more interesting things happen in your life, or don't bother making a movie about it.
Awe inspiring.
Heart wrenching.
That's what makes a good story.
This dramedy wasn't funny enough, nor dramatic enough, to effectively work as anything.
Seemed like just a chance to get Bill Murray to goof his way through a movie and it would be winning just based on his charm.
Then throw in lots of big name, small role co-stars and you'll have an indie smash.
Color me unimpressed.
# 5
High Rise
The film captured the look and texture of the 70s.
Which is really good, since that's when the movie takes place.
Maybe that's the problem.
Had this movie been made in the 80s or even 90s, you could think, why yes, it's still a strong parable for class warfare.
Waiting this long however, the tale just seems to be a goofy cautionary tale that isn't really warning us of anything, and if it's a black comedy/satire...
Well, it's just not that good, period.
Tremendous cast, thrown to the wolves.
Pity.
# 4
The Good Dinosaur
Pixar finally hits rock bottom for yours truly.
A miss-mash of attempted gags, dangled loosely together with a storyline that feels very familiar.
Which it should, because it borrows, heavily, from so many other, better films that came before it.
By the time it flipped into a western, even Sam Elliot couldn't save this one, and I began laughing at the film, not with the film.
That said, the background scenery in this film is AMAZING!
# 3
Pan
Ugh.
Just the thought of watching this one makes me ache again.
It started off great with snatching the boys during the Blitz in London.
Then they went to Neverland, broke into a Nirvana musical number, and they lost me as a viewer from that moment onward.
If anything else happened that could have salvaged the film, it was too little, too late from this movie.
I will happily endure just about any of the Disney Tinkerbell movies before I would ever even think of trying this one again.
Of course, those films are absolutely fun to watch, while not destroying the entire Peter Pan concept.
No such luck here.
# 2
The Ridiculous 6For those without Netflix, finally some good news.
:)
Sandler's first outing on Netflix was just not that good.
I've defended most of his films over the years because I often found them to be amusing or really funny.
He seemed to be an automatic punching bag that a Sandler movie was just plain awful, and that's just not true.
Until now.
Aside from the invention of baseball scene, there's not a single funny bit in this entire film.
I worried that Netflix was getting a bad deal, but they said no worries, it was their most viewed movie in history.
Aha.
A bunch of closet Adam Sandler fans after all. :)
And thankfully, his more recent efforts have returned to being much more humorous.
# 1
Fantastic Four (2015)
No.
This is not acceptable.
As we are just weeks away from 2017, superhero movies cannot be this bad anymore, by any studio with any sort of budget.
Dear 20th Century Fox, you either don't know how to make a good Fantastic Four movie, or don't care to even try at this point.
Which is one thing, if you're going to do some low-budget sci-fi / comic-book type hero story with no major implications in the grand scheme of things. Pretend these characters are anyone OTHER than the Fantastic Freakin' Four, and it's almost a decent movie.
But couple it with the rejuvenation of the X-Men franchise with Days of Future Past and Deadpool, and it just seems like this franchise either needs to be given a chance to live and breathe on its own with a more faithful adaptation and less studio meddling...
Or create a Sony-like deal where the first family of Marvel comes back to Marvel Studios.
At least it would get a fair shot at giving the team their best film outing yet.
And this from a guy that really enjoyed the first film, because I thought the relationship between Ben & Johnny was just about perfect. The rest was just extra.
Oh, and one last word of advice: leave Doom alone for now.
He's been done (poorly) to death at this point.
That's it, that's all for this year.
As always, thanks for reading, and hopefully next year will be turkey-free!
But somehow, I doubt it.
:)
Friday, August 19, 2016
Epic Movie...Epic Fail. "Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice"
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)
Rated PG-13
Starring Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Jesse Eisenberg, Diane Lane, Laurence Fishburne, Jeremy Irons, Holly Hunter, Gal Gadot,
Directed by Zack Snyder
The Story:
Taking place at the climactic battle in Metropolis, Bruce Wayne (Affleck) watches as Superman (Cavill) pretty much destroys the place in an epic showdown with General Zod. Fast forward 18 months, the world isn't sure whether or not to trust Superman, and reports of the return of the vigilante Batman, more ruthless than ever are circulating out of Gotham. These two are on a collision course, and it's not going to be pretty.
Okay, so let me repeat something I've said before:
The first cinematic team-up of Batman and Superman, ever, should have been a license for DC to print money. It should have been so amazing when it was released, that it would still be playing in theaters today.
It should be the highest grossing movie of all time, even after adjusting for inflation!
Why?
EVERYONE knows who Superman and Batman are.
Even if you've never read a comic book, you've seen them, somewhere. Shirt. Lunchbox. Underwear. Hat. Action Figure. Previous movies. Cartoons.
But yet, that didn't happen.
Why not?
Take your pick, this movie offers up 2 and a half hours (!!!!!) of reasons about what went wrong.
Here's my observations:
1) We don't want to be like Marvel!
Good call, so put out dour movies with no humor or really likable characters.
Really, that seems to be DC/Warner Brothers rallying cry.
We want to be the "adult" superhero movie.
They want the critical acclaim and adulation that came with the Nolan Bat-trilogy, but the box office success of Marvel.
I hate to say that you can't have it both ways, because clearly you can.
Except your rallying cry says "we don't want to be Marvel!" and they've consistently put out movies that have been critical and commercial hits.
I can sit here and compare Marvel to DC all day long.
No seriously, I'm at work, and it's kind of fun taking a break you know. :)
But at the end of the day, I try and judge a movie simply by what it brings to the table...
But yes, comparisons are hard to avoid.
Here's some other areas I feel the movie went wrong:
A) Hey, let's make a cohesive DC Universe!
Great idea. Wrong tactic.
Again, Marvel introduced us, slow burn, to each character who would eventually make up the Avengers.
DC has started with The Avengers, more or less, and said, see, one big universe.
Except they are starting with a sequel to a movie (Man of Steel) that...sucked...is that the good critical term?
I have little problem with Cavill in the suit, of course, they rarely let him say or do much except punch and be angry while wearing it.
I have a bigger problem with the suit.
That's not Superman.
He should be bright and shiny (not literally...ugh...) but those reds and blues should pop out, and not be subdued and shadowy, nearly black on viewing.
That's Batman's job.
B) Nobody cared that Superman died (whoops, Spoiler!) .
Let's be honest, when Doomsday killed Superman in the comics (whoops, spoiler again!) it was a BIG deal! Sure, nobody thought he would stay dead dead, but for a bit, he was dead. And the world mourned.
Why?
He'd been doing it for-ev-er. He was the gold standard that all the heroes looked up to, and when he gave his life in battle, the entire world mourned. All the heroes gathered to bury their comrade, and the entire world was saddened.
Hello... not 5 minute earlier, the world was trying to decide if they should worship Superman or deport him because he was too dangerous and an unknown entity.
So when Superman dies at the end of the movie...meh.
Aside from Martha (Lane) and Lois (Adams) who really cared? Batman, a bit, because he realized he had misjudged Clark. But the show by America was just that, a show. "Whoops, our bad, thanks Supes!"
C) The Dark Knight Returned Too Soon
Speaking of scrambling storylines, how about the proverbial DC omelette where they took the battle from The Dark Knight Returns and mixed it into this film. Except again, they take the older, wiser (eh...) Batman against a rookie Superman. Too soon, too unnecessary.
D) Someone thought Jesse Eisenberg would be a great Lex Luthor.
He didn't. Shame on you, and I hope you're now looking for work somewhere. Not sure what movie he thought he was in, but he seemed to be channeling more of the Joker than Luthor when he was onscreen.
E) The "Ultimate Edition" DVD has another 30 minutes of footage that makes the story better
Bzzzt.
Wrong answer.
While it may be true, no DVD release containing footage should make a movie "make more sense and be easier to follow" than what was released in theaters. If that's the case, your editors are failing at their job.
An enhanced version should enhance the story, not tell it better.
Okay, I need to stop kicking this dead horse while it's down, so what, if anything did they get right:
I) Ben Affleck makes a great Bruce Wayne & Batman
II) Gal Gadot is great as Wonder Woman
III) Jeremy Irons was terrific as Alfred
The fact that this movie was so savaged by critics and rejected by audiences caused DC/Warner to stop, reshoot Suicide Squad to inject "more humor" and move some studio bosses around to get a better handle on their universe.
So basically they decided:
1) We
Good call.
However, I need to grade on a curve with superhero films, and much like The Fantastic Four suffered because of what they "Should Have" done compared to what they did, so to will this film.
There was just too much unrealized and wasted potential, and too much grim atmosphere.
Not my particular flavor of superheroics.
If I'm going to spend 2 1/2 hours of my life watching superheroes...
well...
Make Mine Marvel.
Final Grade: D+
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)














